Community Dental Health

cover art

Cover Date:
June 2015
Print ISSN:
0265 539X
Vol:
32
Issue:
2

Identifying dentists’ attitudes towards prevention guidance using Q-sort methodology

© BASCD 2015 doi:10.1922/CDH_3417Witton05

Identifying dentists’ attitudes towards prevention guidance using Q-sort methodology

R.V. Witton and D.R. Moles

Objective: To gain insight into the attitudes and motivating factors of dentists working in the English National Health Service (NHS) towards prevention guidance. Design: Q-methodology: an established hybrid quantitative/qualitative technique used in the social sciences to categorise subjects based on their views by considering factors as part of their overall decision-making profile. Setting: General Dental Practices offering care under an NHS contract. Subjects and methods: NHS dentists (n=26) placed 36 statements about prevention guidance derived from an earlier study into a distribution grid that ranked the statements from “most agree” to “most disagree”. Principal components factor analysis was applied to determine the principal patterns in the rankings of statements. Results: Analysis indicated a total of six distinct profiles within the responses, of which three profiles had at least six dentists loading onto them. The first profile was strongly characterised by dentists who appear motivated to provide prevention but financial and time constraints prevent them from doing so. The second was characterised by dentists using prevention guidance but restricting its use to only certain patients. The third was characterised by dentists who appeared “health-focused”. They placed importance on working to prevention guidance, but were keen to have greater patient and professional support in achieving this. Conclusion: In this group of dentists Q-methodology identified three main profiles to the delivery of prevention guidance.

Key words: health promotion, oral health, general dental practitioners, England, methods

Article Price
£15.00
Institution Article Price
£
Page Start
72
Page End
76
Authors
R.V. Witton, D.R. Moles

Articles from this issue

  • Title
  • Pg. Start
  • Pg. End

  1. Editorial
  2. 66
  3. 67

  1. Dental Public Health in Action
  2. 68
  3. 71

  1. Identifying dentists’ attitudes towards prevention guidance using Q-sort methodology
  2. 72
  3. 76

  1. Dentists’ knowledge of oral health during pregnancy: a review of the last 10 years’ publications
  2. 77
  3. 82

  1. A new capitation payment system in dentistry: the patients’ perspective
  2. 83
  3. 88

  1. A pilot project to improve the oral health of orphans and of the elderly in residential care in Constanta, Romania
  2. 89
  3. 92

  1. Caries experience among Romanian schoolchildren: prevalence and trends 1992-2011
  2. 93
  3. 97

  1. The association between parents’ perceived social norms for toothbrushing and the frequency with which they report brushing their child’s teeth
  2. 98
  3. 103

  1. Association between dental status and food diversity among older Japanese
  2. 104
  3. 110

  1. Are Stage of Change constructs relevant for subjective oral health in a vulnerable population?
  2. 111
  3. 116

  1. Human papillomavirus and oral cancer: a primer for dental public health professionals
  2. 117
  3. 128